Should third party consent to research be mandated? Should there be a right for third parties to have data about them withdrawn from a research project? Two perspectives.[Series of two articles]: Part 2.[Ethics Committee reflection.] [Book Review]

Monash Bioethics Review 23 (1):83 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Should third party consent to research be mandated? Should there be a right for third parties to have data about them withdrawn from a research project? Two perspectives. [REVIEW]Martin Delatycki - 2004 - Monash Bioethics Review 23 (1):S75-S86.
Local Research Ethics Committees can audit ethical standards in research.J. Berry - 1997 - Journal of Medical Ethics 23 (6):379-381.
Reporting of ethics-related methods in epidemiological research.K. H. Jacobsen - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (4):262-267.
Perceptions of Autonomy, Privacy and Informed Consent in the Care of Elderly People in Five European Countries: general overview.Helena Leino-Kilpi, Maritta Välimäki, Theo Dassen, Maria Gasull, Chryssoula Lemonidou, Anja Schopp, P. Anne Scott, Marianne Arndt & Anne Kaljonen - 2003 - Nursing Ethics 10 (1):18-27.
The Low Risk Research Ethics Application Process at CQUniversity Australia.Teresa Moore & Kristy Richardson - 2013 - Journal of Academic Ethics 11 (3):211-230.
'Appropriate consent' and the use of human material for research purposes: the competent adult.J. V. McHale - 2006 - Clinical Ethics 1 (4):195-199.
Research Ethics in a Business School Context: The Establishment of a Review Committee and the Primary Issues of Concern. [REVIEW]Michelle Cunningham - 2010 - Journal of Academic Ethics 8 (1):43-66.
The limits of consent: a socio-ethical approach to human subject research in medicine.Oonagh Corrigan (ed.) - 2009 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The Role, Remit and Function of the Research Ethics Committee — 5. Collective Decision-Making and Research Ethics Committees.Sarah Jl Edwards - 2011 - Research Ethics 7 (1):19-23.
Consent Under Pressure: The Puzzle of Third Party Coercion.Joseph Millum - 2014 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17 (1):113-127.
The reporting of irb review in journal articles presenting hiv research conducted in the developing world.Robert L. Klitzman, Kelly Kleinert, Hoda Rifai-Bashjawish & L. E. U. Shiung - 2011 - Developing World Bioethics 11 (3):161-169.
Ethical aspects in tissue research: thematic analysis of ethical statements to the research ethics committee.Arja Halkoaho, Anna-Maija Pietilä, Mari Vesalainen & Kirsi Vähäkangas - 2012 - BMC Medical Ethics 13 (1):20.
Confronting Condescending Ethics: How Community-Based Research Challenges Traditional Approaches to Consent, Confidentiality, and Capacity. [REVIEW]Colleen Reid & Elana Brief - 2009 - Journal of Academic Ethics 7 (1-2):75-85.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-09

Downloads
2 (#1,808,280)

6 months
1 (#1,478,781)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references