Reintroducing “reintroducing group selection to the human behavioral sciences”to BBS readers

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):304-305 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Wilson and Sober's (1994t) revival of group selection theory may have failed with some readers because its simple arithmetic foundation was obscured under the complexities of its presentation. When that uncontrovertible principle is uncovered, it broadens dramatically the fundamental motives that social scientists may impute to human nature and still be consistent with Darwinian evolutionary theory.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The evolution of altruism: The sober/wilson model.Peter Gildenhuys - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (1):27-48.
Why won't the group selection controversy go away?Samir Okasha - 2001 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52 (1):25-50.
Holism, Individualism, and the Units of Selection.Elliott Sober - 1980 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:93 - 121.
Niche construction and group selection.Nicholas S. Thompson - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (1):161-162.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
37 (#433,006)

6 months
19 (#137,170)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Niche construction: A pervasive force in evolution?Wim J. van der Steen - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (1):162-163.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references