Normativism versus mechanism

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (5):272-273 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Using normative correctness as a diagnostic tool reduces the outcome of complex cognitive functions to a binary classification (normative or non-normative). It also focuses attention on outcomes, rather than processes, impeding the development of good cognitive theories. Given that both normative and non-normative responses may be produced by the same process, normativity is a poor indicator of underlying processes

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,813

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Dynamicists versus computationalists: Whither mechanists?William Bechtel - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):629-629.
Narrow versus wide mechanism.Jack Copeland - 2002 - In Matthias Scheutz (ed.), Computationalism: New Directions. MIT Press. pp. 5-32.
Resisting normativism in psychology.Georges Rey - 2007 - In Brian P. McLaughlin & Jonathan D. Cohen (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Mind. Blackwell.
Consciousness versus states of being conscious.Ernst Pöppel - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):155-156.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-27

Downloads
33 (#497,206)

6 months
6 (#579,310)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?