Mill in parliament : when should a philosopher compromise?

In Nadia Urbinati & Alex Zakaras (eds.), J.S. Mill's Political Thought: A Bicentennial Reassessment. Cambridge University Press (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Historical Analysis of Goldsworthy's Sovereignty of Parliament.Margaret Kelly - 2002 - Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy 27:156-171.
Getting mill right.Deni Elliott - 2007 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 22 (2-3):100 – 112.
Scoring Rules and Epistemic Compromise.Sarah Moss - 2011 - Mind 120 (480):1053-1069.
Integrity and compromise in nursing ethics.Gerald R. Winslow - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (3):307-323.
Political writings.James Mill - 1992 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Terence Ball.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Dennis Thompson
Leeds Metropolitan University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references