General-Purpose Institutional Decision-Making Heuristics: The Case of Decision-Making under Deep Uncertainty

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Recent work in judgment and decisionmaking has stressed that institutions, like individuals, often rely on decisionmaking heuristics. But most of the institutional decisionmaking heuristics studied to date are highly firm- and industry-specific. This contrasts to the individual case, in which many heuristics are general-purpose rules suitable for a wide range of decision problems. Are there also general-purpose heuristics for institutional decisionmaking? In this paper, I argue that a number of methods recently developed for decisionmaking under deep uncertainty have a good claim to be understood as general-purpose decisionmaking heuristics suitable for a broad range of institutional decision problems.

Similar books and articles

Decision Making Under Great Uncertainty.Sven Ove Hansson - 1996 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 26 (3):369-386.
Decision making under great uncertainty.Sven Ove Hansson - 1996 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 26 (3):369-386.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-08-26

Downloads
386 (#51,115)

6 months
144 (#24,369)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Thorstad
Vanderbilt University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Alienation, consequentialism, and the demands of morality.Peter Railton - 1984 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 13 (2):134-171.
Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory.Dan Sperber - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (2):57.
Rational choice and the structure of the environment.Herbert A. Simon - 1956 - Psychological Review 63 (2):129-138.
Subjective Probabilities Should be Sharp.Adam Elga - 2010 - Philosophers' Imprint 10.

View all 19 references / Add more references