Abstract

On se propose d'éclairer une filiation méconnue du concept de critique : la critique philologique. Depuis l'affirmation du caractère inéluctable de l'Ars critica dans le rapport aux textes de la tradition, telle que la formule Jean Le Clerc (1657-1736) au terme d'un siècle de critique philologique, et que cherche à l'articuler à la philosophie C. A. Heumann (1681-1764), à sa promotion comme condition de l'activité philosophique chez Kant, la critique, entendue comme exercice du jugement singulier, acquiert une portée générale, mais au prix d'une transformation de son statut. Has classical scholarship anything to do with philosophy ? In so far as philological criticism promoted the exercice of singular judgement on texts, it can be regarded as having contributed to the emergence of critical philosophy, as a philosophy based on judgement, by Kant. This paper analyzes the relationship between philological and philosophical criticism from the generalization of the (philological) Ars critica by Jean Le Clerc (1697), the leader of the European République des Lettres, through its comment by Christoph August Heumann, one of the prominent German Polyhistor, in his comments De arte critica (1712), till the well-known Critique of pure reason (1781), that assumes only the intellectual gestus of the philological criticism, without its textual support