Academic citizenship: An academic colleagues' working paper [Book Review]

Journal of Academic Ethics 3 (2-4):127-142 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Universities are facing a critical challenge; university citizenship has steadily declined over the last few decades. As a self-governing entity, most of the foundational elements of a university community are within its own control. As a result, the health and future welfare of the institution depends greatly on the quality of its leaders and robustness of its governing structure. These in turn depend on the quality of those undertaking leadership roles and serving on governing bodies and on the degree to which they reflect its values and aspirations. Maximising the probability that these desiderata will be achieved requires a broad-based faculty willingness to serve conscientiously on these bodies and to serve as administrators to be involved in selecting members, and to be involved on the myriad of sub-committees, task forces, departmental committees, and the like. It is not only an abdication of citizenship to leave governance and administration of the institution to a few willing faculty, it is dangerous and puts at risk the welfare of the institution. Even if these few were all able to place the welfare of the institution above their own particular agendas and their self-interest (not something on which to count), the process of self-selection could not be expected to result in a group that would adequately reflect, represent or understand the breadth and depth of the needs, aspirations and complex circumstances of the entire institution. The larger the pool of willing participants, the greater the probability that those selected will reflect best the institutional diversity. This paper draws out the rights and obligations of faculty citizens embedded in the structural arrangements common to universities in the western world. In part A we examine three fundamental components of those arrangements, components that collectively define certain rights and entail certain obligations of citizenship. These obligations flow in part from essential rights, and also in part from what is necessary to sustain the viability and vibrancy of the community. In Part B, we examine some of these essential obligations of citizenship. In Part C, we make recommendations about how to promote effective citizenship; these recommendations are collected after Part C under the heading “Recommendations.”.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,100

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Human rights, or citizenship?Paulina Tambakaki - 2010 - New York: Birkbeck Law Press.
Ethics, academic freedom and academic tenure.Richard T. De George - 2003 - Journal of Academic Ethics 1 (1):11-25.
Citizenship, Inc.Wayne Norman - 2008 - Business Ethics Quarterly 18 (1):1-26.
Environment and citizenship: integrating justice, responsibility and civic engagement.Mark J. Smith - 2008 - New York: Distributed in the USA exclusively by Palgrave Macmillan. Edited by Piya Pangsapa.
Dialectics of Citizenship.Ruth Lister - 1997 - Hypatia 12 (4):6-26.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
33 (#485,976)

6 months
4 (#795,160)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paul Thompson
Cardinal Stritch College

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Taking rights seriously.Ronald Dworkin (ed.) - 1977 - London: Duckworth.
Two treatises of government.John Locke - 1947 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Peter Laslett.
Taking Rights Seriously.Ronald Dworkin - 1979 - Ethics 90 (1):121-130.
Taking Rights Seriously.Ronald Dworkin - 1979 - Mind 88 (350):305-309.
The social contract.Jean-Jacques Rousseau - 1905 - Harmondsworth,: Penguin Books. Edited by Charles Frankel.

View all 25 references / Add more references