- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The Great Devonian Controversy: The Shaping of Scientific Knowledge among Gentlemanly Specialists
[author unknown]
Journal of the History of Biology 19 (2):318-319 (1985)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
Martin J.S. Rudwick. The Great Devonian Controversy: The Shaping of Scientific Knowledge Among Gentlemanly Specialists. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1985. Pp. xxxiii + 494. ISBN 0-226-73101-4. £36.75. [REVIEW]J. Morrell - 1987 - British Journal for the History of Science 20 (1):88-89.
Scientific ResolutionThe Great Devonian Controversy: The Shaping of Scientific Knowledge among Gentlemanly SpecialistsMartin J. S. Rudwick.Frank M. Turner - 1986 - Isis 77 (3):508-511.
Scottish and French Enlightenment J. Mackintosh and the revolution controversy in Great Britain.Eleni Xilakis - 2014 - SOCRATES 2 (JUNE 2014):79-88.
Michael Polanyi and Thomas Kuhn: Priority and Credit.Struan Jacobs - 2006 - Tradition and Discovery 33 (2):25-36.
Constructing Audiences in Scientific Controversy.Jason A. Delborne - 2011 - Social Epistemology 25 (1):67-95.
Debating Troy in the Mass Media – The Catalytic Impact of Public Controversy on Academic Discourse.Susann Wagenknecht - 2012 - In Simone Roedder Martina FranzenPeter Weingart & Peter Weingart (eds.), The Sciences’ Media Connection – Public Communication and its Repercussions. Springer. pp. 291-306.
Sustaining a Controversy: The Non-classical Ion Debate.William Goodwin - 2013 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 64 (4):787-816.
Knowledge as Kennenlernen : Subjectivity, Pluralism, and Intimacy.Mimi Marinucci - 2010 - Social Epistemology 24 (4):301-311.
The Dimensions of Scientific Controversy: The Biometric—Mendelian Debate.Robert Olby - 1989 - British Journal for the History of Science 22 (3):299-320.
Objective Knowledge and the Knowing Subject: The Popper-Kuhn Debate.Lloyd Martin Eby - 1988 - Dissertation, Fordham University
Epistemic dependence and collective scientific knowledge.Jeroen de Ridder - 2014 - Synthese 191 (1):1-17.
The Public Dimension Of Scientific Controversies.Jeanine Czubaroff - 1997 - Argumentation 11 (1):51-74.
Analytics
Added to PP
2017-02-22
Downloads
0
6 months
0
2017-02-22
Downloads
0
6 months
0
Historical graph of downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Citations of this work
Unconceived alternatives and conservatism in science: the impact of professionalization, peer-review, and Big Science.P. Kyle Stanford - 2015 - Synthese:1-18.
International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching.Michael R. Matthews (ed.) - 2014 - Springer.
The Place of Knowledge A Methodological Survey.Adi Ophir & Steven Shapin - 1991 - Science in Context 4 (1):3-22.
Catastrophism, Uniformitarianism, and a Scientific Realism Debate That Makes a Difference.P. Kyle Stanford - 2015 - Philosophy of Science 82 (5):867-878.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-5ff6c685cb-ldh8k uwo