Paraconsistent Belief Revision based on a formal consistency operator

CLE E-Prints 15 (8):01-11 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper two systems of AGM-like Paraconsistent Belief Revision are overviewed, both defined over Logics of Formal Inconsistency (LFIs) due to the possibility of defining a formal consistency operator within these logics. The AGM° system is strongly based on this operator and internalize the notion of formal consistency in the explicit constructions and postulates. Alternatively, the AGMp system uses the AGM-compliance of LFIs and thus assumes a wider notion of paraconsistency - not necessarily related to the notion of formal consistency.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Paraconsistentist Approach to Chisholm's Paradox.Marcelo Esteban Coniglio & Newton Marques Peron - 2009 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 13 (3):299-326.
Paraconsistent dynamics.Patrick Girard & Koji Tanaka - 2016 - Synthese 193 (1):1-14.
Paraconsistency Everywhere.Greg Restall - 2002 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 43 (3):147-156.
Negation and Paraconsistent Logics.Soma Dutta & Mihir K. Chakraborty - 2011 - Logica Universalis 5 (1):165-176.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-12-28

Downloads
414 (#48,354)

6 months
79 (#61,007)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Marcelo E. Coniglio
University of Campinas
Rafael Testa
University of Campinas

References found in this work

Semi-revision.Sven Hansson - 1997 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 7 (1-2):151-175.

Add more references