Optimalism and Theism. A comment on Nicholas Rescher

Philosophisches Jahrbuch 123 (2):566-574 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper is a comment on Nicholas Rescher's article about Leibnizian optimalism. In this text, Rescher takes up Leibniz's question 'Why is there anything at all?' and defends metaphysical optimalism as a proper answer. While I agree with Rescher's overall line of reasoning I disagree with the way he treats the relation between optimalism and theism. Unlike Rescher, I make a case for the claim that optimalism presupposes theism.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Optimalism and the Grounds of Existential Truths.Yannic Kappes - 2017 - Philosophisches Jahrbuch 124 (2):263-271.
Ultimate Explanations.Alexander R. Pruss - 2005 - Contemporary Pragmatism 2 (2):35-48.
Optimalism and the Rationality of the Real.Nicholas Rescher - 2006 - Review of Metaphysics 59 (3):503-516.
Collected papers.Nicholas Rescher - 2005 - New Brunswick: Ontos Verlag.
The Philosophy of Nicholas Rescher.Robin Haack, Nicholas Rescher & Ernest Sosa - 1981 - Philosophical Quarterly 31 (123):172.
What Sort of Pragmatist is Nicholas Rescher?Larry A. Hickman - 2005 - Contemporary Pragmatism 2 (2):9-15.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-04-03

Downloads
12 (#1,092,281)

6 months
6 (#531,855)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references