The Intention Debate in German Criminal Law

Ratio Juris 17 (3):346-380 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article considers the various suggestions that have been put forward by German scholars to replace the traditional concept of intention, which the author has criticized elsewhere (Taylor 2004). The debate on this topic has become a minor academic industry in Germany, and should be better known as the English-speaking world struggles with its own concepts of intention. Despite the great amount of effort and ingenuity devoted to this topic in Germany, however, the author concludes that only one theory of intention, that put forward by Professor Wolfgang Frisch, shows any substantial degree of promise

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,991

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Concepts of Intention in German Criminal Law.G. Taylor - 2004 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 24 (1):99-127.
Kingdoms of the Blind. [REVIEW]W. B. - 1981 - Review of Metaphysics 34 (4):803-804.
Civilized Squatting.Oliver Radley-Gardner - 2005 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 25 (4):727-747.
Intention and ‘Absicht’.Margit Gaffal - 2017 - In Jesús Padilla Gálvez & Margit Gaffal (eds.), Intentionality and Action. Berlin: De Gruyter. pp. 103-122.
Intention and Culpability.Jacqueline A. Laing - 1997 - Dissertation, Oxford
Anscombe and the Unity of Intention.Noam Melamed - 2020 - Enrahonar: Quaderns de Filosofía 64:113-133.
Intention, Action, Responsibility.Vitaly Ogleznev - 2015 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 45 (3):199-209.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-02

Downloads
55 (#298,090)

6 months
10 (#309,174)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations