Informal Networked Deliberation: How Mass Deliberative Democracy Really Works

Analyse & Kritik 45 (1):23-54 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Deliberative democracy started out as an ideal for mass democracy. Lately, however, its large-scale ambitions have mostly been shelved. This article revivifies the ideal of mass deliberative democracy by offering a clear mechanism by which everyone in the community can be included in the same conversation. The trick is to make use of people’s overlapping social communicative networks through which informal deliberative exchanges already occur on an everyday basis. Far from being derailed by threats of polarization, echo chambers, and motivated reasoning, informal networked deliberation can indeed put everyone in touch, directly or indirectly, with everyone else.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,628

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Pictures of Politics.Bert van den Brink - 2012 - Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 98 (3):396-410.
Rhetoric and the Public Sphere.Simone Chambers - 2009 - Political Theory 37 (3):323-350.
Deliberative Democracy and Constitutions.James S. Fishkin - 2011 - Social Philosophy and Policy 28 (1):242-260.
Matters of Deliberative Democracy: Is Conversation the Soul of Democracy?Maria Corina Barbaros - 2015 - Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy 7 (1):143-165.
Can We Talk It Out?Miguel Egler - forthcoming - Episteme:1-19.
Democracy, deliberation and disobedience.William Smith - 2004 - Res Publica 10 (4):353-377.
Robust Deliberative Democracy.Daniel Layman - 2016 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 28 (3-4):494-516.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-06-09

Downloads
16 (#901,783)

6 months
13 (#190,565)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?