- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Research Ethics and Justice: The Case of Finland
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 28 (3):551-576 (2019)
Abstract
Abstract:This paper explores how Finnish research ethics deals with matters of justice on the levels of practical regulation, political morality, and theoretical studies. The bioethical sets of principles introduced by Tom Beauchamp and James Childress in the United States and Jacob Dahl Rendtorff and Peter Kemp in Europe provide the conceptual background, together with a recently introduced conceptual map of theories of justice and their dimensions. The most striking finding is that the internationally recognized requirement of informed consent for research on humans can be ideologically tricky in a Scandinavian welfare state setting.My notes
Similar books and articles
Philosophy, theology, and the claims of justice.Karen Lebacqz - 2006 - In David E. Guinn (ed.), Handbook of Bioethics and Religion. Oxford University Press.
Feminist intersectionality: Bringing social justice to health disparities research.Jamie Rogers & Ursula A. Kelly - 2011 - Nursing Ethics 18 (3):397-407.
Justice in international clinical research.Bridget Pratt & Bebe Loff - 2010 - Developing World Bioethics 11 (2):75-81.
Healthcare Ethics in Finland: A Follow-up.Pekka Louhiala & Tuija Takala - 2004 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 13 (3):236-240.
A Conceptual Structure of Justice - Providing a Tool to Analyse Conceptions of Justice.Klara Helene Stumpf, Christian U. Becker & Stefan Baumgärtner - 2016 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 19 (5):1187-1202.
Justice, Ethics and Economics.Carl-Henric Grenholm - 2004 - Studies in Christian Ethics 17 (2):47-61.
Ethics in Biomedical Research: International Perspectives.Matti Häyry, Tuija Takala & Peter Herissone-Kelly (eds.) - 2007 - Brill | Rodopi.
One Justice or Two? A Model of Reconciliation of Normative Justice Theories and Empirical Research on Organizational Justice.Natàlia Cugueró-Escofet & Marion Fortin - 2014 - Journal of Business Ethics 124 (3):435-451.
Global ethics: a short reflection on then and now.Darrel Moellendorf & Heather Widdows - 2014 - Journal of Global Ethics 10 (3):319-325.
A Framework to Link International Clinical Research to the Promotion of Justice in Global Health.Bridget Pratt & Bebe Loff - 2013 - Bioethics 27 (3):387-396.
Linking international clinical research with stateless populations to justice in global health.Bridget Pratt, Deborah Zion, Khin Maung Lwin, Phaik Yeong Cheah, Francois Nosten & Bebe Loff - 2014 - BMC Medical Ethics 15 (1):49.
What Do the Various Principles of Justice Mean Within the Concept of Benefit Sharing?Bege Dauda, Yvonne Denier & Kris Dierickx - 2016 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 13 (2):281-293.
Organizational Justice and Behavioral Ethics: Promises and Prospects.Russell Cropanzano & Jordan H. Stein - 2009 - Business Ethics Quarterly 19 (2):193-233.
Moral Principles and Ethics Committees: A Case against Bioethical Theories.Anna C. Zielinska - 2015 - Ethics and Social Welfare 9 (3):269-279.
Business Ethics in Finland.Petri Laine Minna Halme - 1994 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 3 (4):191-195.
Analytics
Added to PP
2019-07-13
Downloads
15 (#968,256)
6 months
5 (#696,273)
2019-07-13
Downloads
15 (#968,256)
6 months
5 (#696,273)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Just Better Utilitarianism.Matti Häyry - 2021 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 30 (2):343-367.
Causation, Responsibility, and Harm: How the Discursive Shift from Law and Ethics to Social Justice Sealed the Plight of Nonhuman Animals.Matti Häyry - 2020 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 29 (2):246-267.
Commentary: In Search of Medical Ethics and Its Foundation with Rosamond Rhodes.Tuija Takala & Matti Häyry - 2020 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 29 (3):429-436.
Editorial: Examining the Links.Tuija Takala & Matti Häyry - 2020 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 29 (2):167-173.
References found in this work
Principles of Biomedical Ethics.Ezekiel J. Emanuel, Tom L. Beauchamp & James F. Childress - 1995 - Hastings Center Report 25 (4):37.
Doctrines and Dimensions of Justice: Their Historical Backgrounds and Ideological Underpinnings.Matti Häyry - 2018 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 27 (2):188-216.
What Is Wrong with Global Bioethics? On the Limitations of the Four Principles Approach.Tuija Takala - 2001 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 10 (1):72-77.
High hopes and automatic escalators: a critique of some new arguments in bioethics.S. Holm & T. Takala - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (1):1-4.
Genetic ignorance, moral obligations and social duties.Tuija Takala & Matti Häyry - 2000 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (1):107 – 113.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-747975fc64-sshfw uwo