- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
When Null Hypothesis Significance Testing Is Unsuitable for Research: A Reassessment
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 11 (2017)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Chow's defense of Null-hypothesis testing: Too traditional?Robert W. Frick - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):199-199.
The logic of Null hypothesis testing.Edward Erwin - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):197-198.
Korn and Freidlin's Misunderstanding of the Null Hypothesis Significance Testing Procedure.Stephen Rice & David Trafimow - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (3):15-16.
Statistical significance testing, hypothetico-deductive method, and theory evaluation.Brian D. Haig - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (2):292-293.
Problems With Null Hypothesis Significance Testing (NHST): What Do the Textbooks Say?George A. Morgan - unknown
Significance testing – does it need this defence?Günther Palm - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):214-215.
Testing a precise null hypothesis: the case of Lindley’s paradox.Jan Sprenger - 2013 - Philosophy of Science 80 (5):733-744.
The historical case against Null-hypothesis significance testing.Henderikus J. Stam & Grant A. Pasay - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):219-220.
Null-hypothesis tests are not completely stupid, but bayesian statistics are better.David Rindskopf - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):215-216.
A viable alternative to Null-hypothesis testing.Bruno D. Zumbo - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):227-228.
Précis of statistical significance: Rationale, validity, and utility.Siu L. Chow - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):169-194.
Anthropomorphism, anthropectomy, and the null hypothesis.Kristin Andrews & Brian Huss - 2014 - Biology and Philosophy 29 (5):711-729.
A farewell to normative Null hypothesis testing in base rate research.Jonathan J. Koehler - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (4):780-782.
A Review of Rozeboom’s Ideas with an Analysis of Issues in Null Hypothesis Significance Testing. [REVIEW]Lexi Brunner - 2018 - Constellations 9 (1):11-19.
Meta-analysis, power analysis, and the Null-hypothesis significance-test procedure.Joseph S. Rossi - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):216-217.
Analytics
Added to PP
2019-10-02
Downloads
18 (#831,783)
6 months
8 (#359,856)
2019-10-02
Downloads
18 (#831,783)
6 months
8 (#359,856)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
What type of Type I error? Contrasting the Neyman–Pearson and Fisherian approaches in the context of exact and direct replications.Mark Rubin - 2021 - Synthese 198 (6):5809–5834.
Cohen’s convention and the body of knowledge in behavioral science.Aran Arslan & Frank Zenker - manuscript
The Impact of Complexity on Methods and Findings in Psychological Science.David M. Sanbonmatsu, Emily H. Cooley & Jonathan E. Butner - 2021 - Frontiers in Psychology 11:580111.
Statistical Inference and the Replication Crisis.Lincoln J. Colling & Dénes Szűcs - 2018 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 12 (1):121-147.
Farewell to Bright-Line: A Guide to Reporting Quantitative Results Without the S-Word.Kevin M. Cummins & Charles Marks - 2020 - Frontiers in Psychology 11.
References found in this work
Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference.Judea Pearl - 1988 - Morgan Kaufmann.
Probability Theory. The Logic of Science.Edwin T. Jaynes - 2002 - Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. Edited by G. Larry Bretthorst.
Can cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data?Russell A. Poldrack - 2006 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10 (2):59-63.
The Empire of Chance: How Probability Changed Science and Everyday Life.Gerd Gigerenzer, Zeno Swijtink, Theodore Porter, Lorraine Daston, John Beatty & Lorenz Kruger - 1990 - Cambridge University Press.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-64dd777598-cl5t5 uwo