Whitehead's Philosophy: Eternal Objects and God

Philosophy 17 (65):47 - 68 (1942)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Universe cannot be exhaustively analysed if we stop at actual entities or even societies of actual entities which, as we shall see later when we discuss the notion of ‘nexus,’ are equivalent to what we ordinarily mean by enduring objects such as a stone, a tree, or a man. There is another class of entities which plays an important part in the constitution of the Universe called ‘eternal objects,’ and we must now proceed to an understanding of these.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,100

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Temporal and Nontemporal Becoming.Lewis S. Ford - 2009 - Process Studies 38 (1):5-42.
Marcuse and Eternal Objects.Duston Moore - 2008 - Process Studies 37 (2):45-67.
Non-Rigid Forms.Lewis S. Ford - 2008 - Process Studies 37 (2):68-73.
Of what use are Whitehead's eternal objects?Everett W. Hall - 1930 - Journal of Philosophy 27 (2):29-44.
Eternal objects, attributes, and relations in Whitehead's philosophy.Vernon M. Root - 1953 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 14 (2):196-204.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
27 (#591,340)

6 months
5 (#644,465)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references