- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Growing World Consensus to Leave Circumcision Decision to the Affected Individual
American Journal of Bioethics 15 (2):46-48 (2015)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Analytics
Added to PP
2015-02-13
Downloads
29 (#567,300)
6 months
10 (#308,281)
2015-02-13
Downloads
29 (#567,300)
6 months
10 (#308,281)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Ritual Male Infant Circumcision and Human Rights”.Allan J. Jacobs & Kavita S. Arora - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (3):W1 - W4.
References found in this work
Ritual Male Infant Circumcision and Human Rights.Allan J. Jacobs & Kavita Shah Arora - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (2):30-39.
After Cologne: male circumcision and the law. Parental right, religious liberty or criminal assault?Reinhard Merkel & Holm Putzke - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (7):444-449.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-8fb5884b9-k4bxp uwo