Canonicity for intensional logics with even axioms

Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (3):1141-1156 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper looks at the concept of neighborhood canonicity introduced by BRIAN CHELLAS [2]. We follow the lead of the author's paper [9] where it was shown that every non-iterative logic is neighborhood canonical and here we will show that all logics whose axioms have a simple syntactic form-no intensional operator is in boolean combination with a propositional letter-and which have the finite model property are neighborhood canonical. One consequence of this is that KMcK, the McKinsey logic, is neighborhood canonical, an interesting counterpoint to the results of ROBERT GOLDBLATT and XIAOPING WANG who showed, respectively, that KMcK is not relational canonical [5] and that KMcK is not relationally strongly complete [11]

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,197

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
244 (#83,732)

6 months
13 (#199,525)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Neighborhood Semantics for Modal Logic.Eric Pacuit - 2017 - Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Complete additivity and modal incompleteness.Wesley H. Holliday & Tadeusz Litak - 2019 - Review of Symbolic Logic 12 (3):487-535.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Two modellings for theory change.Adam Grove - 1988 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 17 (2):157-170.
Normal forms in modal logic.Kit Fine - 1975 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 16 (2):229-237.
The McKinsey axiom is not canonical.Robert Goldblatt - 1991 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 56 (2):554-562.
The McKinsey axiom is not compact.Xiaoping Wang - 1992 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 57 (4):1230-1238.

View all 6 references / Add more references