Leo Strauss on political philosophy: responding to the challenge of positivism and historicism

London: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Catherine H. Zuckert, Les Harris & Philip Bretton (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Leo Strauss is known primarily for reviving classical political philosophy through careful analyses of works by ancient thinkers. As with his published writings, Strauss’s seminars devoted to specific philosophers were notoriously dense, accessible only to graduate students and scholars with a good command of the subject. In 1965, however, Strauss offered an introductory course on political philosophy at the University of Chicago. Using a conversational style, he sought to make political philosophy, as well as his own ideas and methods, understandable to those with little background on the subject. Leo Strauss on Political Philosophy brings together the lectures that comprise Strauss’s “Introduction to Political Philosophy.” Strauss begins by emphasizing the importance of political philosophy in determining the common good of society and critically examining the two most powerful contemporary challenges to the possibility of using political theory to learn about and develop the best political order: positivism and historicism. In seeking the common good, classical political philosophers like Plato and Aristotle did not distinguish between political philosophy and political science. Today, however, political philosophy must contend with the contemporary belief that it is impossible to know what the good society really is. Strauss emphasizes the need to study the history of political philosophy to see whether the changes in the understanding of nature and conceptions of justice that gradually led people to believe that it is not possible to determine what the best political society is are either necessary or valid. In doing so, he ranges across the entire history of political philosophy, providing a valuable, thematically coherent foundation, including explications of many canonical thinkers, such as Auguste Comte and Immanuel Kant, about whom Strauss did not write extensively in his published writings.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,923

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Ancient as Modern: Leo Strauss and the Revival of Classical Political Philosophy.Spiros Makris - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 69:283-288.
Glaube und Wissen: der Briefwechsel zwischen Eric Voegelin und Leo Strauss von 1934 bis 1964.Leo Strauss - 2010 - München: Wilhelm Fink. Edited by Emmanuel Patard, Peter-Joachim Opitz, Leo Strauss & Eric Voegelin.
Leo Strauss on Why Aristotle Is the Founder of Political Science but Not of Political Philosophy.Douglas Kries - 2013 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 87:261-270.
Leo Strauss on Why Aristotle Is the Founder of Political Science but Not of Political Philosophy.Douglas Kries - 2013 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 87:261-270.
Лео штраус: Критика політичної філософії геґеля.Vladimir V. Prokopenko - 2020 - Вісник Харківського Національного Університету Імені В. Н. Каразіна. Серія «Філософія. Філософські Перипетії» 63:17-25.
An introduction to political philosophy: ten essays.Leo Strauss - 1989 - Detroit: Wayne State University Press. Edited by Hilail Gildin & Leo Strauss.
The political philosophy of Hobbes, its basis and its genesis.Leo Strauss - 1952 - [Chicago]: University of Chicago Press.
“The East within Us”: Leo Strauss’s Reinterpretation of Heidegger.David McIlwain - 2018 - Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy 26 (2):233-253.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-12-07

Downloads
14 (#1,016,720)

6 months
8 (#414,134)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references