God's problem of multiple choice

Religious Studies 42 (2):141-157 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A question that has been largely overlooked by philosophers of religion is how God would be able to effect a rational choice between two worlds of unsurpassable goodness. To answer this question, I draw a parallel with the paradigm cases of indifferent choice, including Buridan's ass, and argue that such cases can be satisfactorily resolved provided that the protagonists employ what Otto Neurath calls an ‘auxiliary motive’. I supply rational grounds for the employment of such a motive, and then argue against the views of Leibniz and Nicholas Rescher to show that this solution would also work for God.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
473 (#42,577)

6 months
70 (#73,538)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lloyd Strickland
Manchester Metropolitan University

Citations of this work

Theism, Possible Worlds, and the Multiverse.Klaas J. Kraay - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 147 (3):355 - 368.
A Solution for Buridan’s Ass.Eugene Chislenko - 2016 - Ethics 126 (2):283-310.
What can we Learn from Buridan's Ass?Ruth Weintraub - 2012 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 42 (3-4):281-301.
Incommensurability, incomparability, and God’s choice of a world.Klaas J. Kraay - 2011 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 69 (2):91-102.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references