The neurobiology of addiction: implications for voluntary control of behavior

American Journal of Bioethics 7 (1):8-11 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There continues to be a debate on whether addiction is best understood as a brain disease or a moral condition. This debate, which may influence both the stigma attached to addiction and access to treatment, is often motivated by the question of whether and to what extent we can justly hold addicted individuals responsible for their actions. In fact, there is substantial evidence for a disease model, but the disease model per se does not resolve the question of voluntary control. Recent research at the intersection of neuroscience and psychology suggests that addicted individuals have substantial impairments in cognitive control of behavior, but this “loss of control” is not complete or simple. Possible mechanisms and implications are briefly reviewed.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Affective neuroscience and addiction.Louis C. Charland - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (1):20-21.
Brain disease or moral condition? Wrong question.Thomas I. Cochrane - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (1):24 – 25.
Addicted to Food, Hungry for Drugs.Bennett Foddy - 2010 - Neuroethics 4 (2):79-89.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-03-13

Downloads
1,747 (#5,796)

6 months
425 (#4,015)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Steven Edward Hyman
Harvard University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations