Stone tools and conceptual structure

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (1):202-203 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Understanding how conceptual structures inform stone tool production and use would help us resolve the issue of a pongid-hominid dichotomy in brain organisation and cognitive ability. Evidence from ideational apraxia suggests that the planning of linguistic and manipulative behaviours is not colocalized in homologous circuits. An alternative account in terms of the evolutionary expansion of the whole prefrontal-premotor area may be more plausible

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,991

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Language and tool making are similar cognitive processes.Ralph L. Holloway - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (4):226-226.
The hominid tool-language connection: Some missing evolutionary links?A. Maryanski - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (1):199-200.
Brains evolution and neurolinguistic preconditions.Wendy K. Wilkins & Jennie Wakefield - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (1):161-182.
Thinking and doing in cognitive archaeology: Giving skill its due.Dietrich Stout - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (3):421-422.
Materiality and human cognition.Karenleigh Overmann & Thomas Wynn - 2019 - Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 2 (26):457–478.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-21

Downloads
39 (#420,937)

6 months
19 (#145,313)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations