Guinea Pig Duties: 7. Contingent Rights of Patients in Clinical Research

Research Ethics 2 (3):85-91 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In these articles I have so far explored the set of duties that call upon patients to participate in clinical research as subjects of it. Here I consider whether they acquire a set of rights in consequence of participation, and what these rights may be.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,923

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The protection of patients' rights in clinical trials.Marek Czarkowski - 2006 - Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (1):131-138.
Guinea Pig Duties: 8. Another Way.T. J. Steiner - 2006 - Research Ethics 2 (4):132-135.
Patients' duties.Michael J. Meyer - 1992 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17 (5):541-555.
The moral foundation of the clinical duties of care: Needs, duties and human rights.Doyal Len - 2001 - In John Harris (ed.), Bioethics. Oxford University Press. pp. 15--520.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-21

Downloads
18 (#857,094)

6 months
4 (#859,620)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Well-being: its meaning, measurement, and moral importance.James Griffin - 1986 - Oxford [Oxfordshire]: Clarendon Press.
The patient as person.Paul Ramsey - 1970 - New Haven,: Yale University Press.

View all 15 references / Add more references