Comments on “locality, Bell's theorem, and quantum mechanics”

Foundations of Physics 15 (9):973-976 (1985)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Two different ideas of locality are described. Both are due essentially to einstein. Quantum theory is compatible with the first but not the second. The problems encountered in the article cited in the title arise from trying to use only the first idea of locality, whereas Bell's-theorem considerations pertain to the second

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,674

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Quantum Locality.Robert B. Griffiths - 2011 - Foundations of Physics 41 (4):705-733.
Locality, Bell's theorem, and quantum mechanics.Peter Rastall - 1985 - Foundations of Physics 15 (9):963-972.
Against 'Realism'.Travis Norsen - 2007 - Foundations of Physics 37 (3):311-340.
Non-Materiality of Non-Locality.Vincenzo Fano - 2004 - Foundations of Physics 34 (12):2005-2013.
Locality and Bell's Theorem.W. De Baere, A. Mann & M. Revzen - 1999 - Foundations of Physics 29 (1):67-77.
How to (properly) strengthen Bell's theorem using counterfactuals.Tomasz Bigaj - 2010 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 41 (1):58-66.
Locality in the Everett Interpretation of Quantum Field Theory.Mark A. Rubin - 2002 - Foundations of Physics 32 (10):1495-1523.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-09

Downloads
73 (#229,723)

6 months
3 (#1,027,541)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations