Autonomy, the moral circle, and the limits of ownership

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46:e350 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Why can't we own people? Boyer proposes that the key consideration concerns inclusion in the moral circle. I propose an alternative, which is that specific mental capacities, especially the capacity for autonomy, play a key role in determining judgments about human and animal ownership. Autonomous beings are viewed as owning themselves, which precludes them from being owned by others.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,592

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ownership Rights.Shaylene E. Nancekivell, Charles J. Millar, Pauline C. Summers & Ori Friedman - 2016 - In Justin Sytsma & Wesley Buckwalter (eds.), A Companion to Experimental Philosophy. Malden, MA: Wiley. pp. 247–256.
Ownership is (likely to be) a moral foundation.Mohammad Atari & Jonathan Haidt - 2023 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46:e326.
Self-ownership, freedom, and autonomy.George G. Brenkert - 1998 - The Journal of Ethics 2 (1):27-55.
Boundary problems and self-ownership.Jessica Flanigan - 2019 - Social Philosophy and Policy 36 (2):9-35.
Self-ownership as personal sovereignty.John Thrasher - 2019 - Social Philosophy and Policy 36 (2):116-133.
A Kantian Defense of Self‐Ownership.Robert S. Taylor - 2004 - Journal of Political Philosophy 12 (1):65-78.
Kant's Conception of Personal Autonomy.Paul Formosa - 2013 - Journal of Social Philosophy 44 (3):193-212.
Ownership and the moral significance of the self.Victor Tadros - 2019 - Social Philosophy and Policy 36 (2):51-70.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-10-11

Downloads
12 (#1,078,270)

6 months
11 (#231,656)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?