“Allow natural death” versus “do not resuscitate”: three words that can change a life

Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (1):2-6 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Physician-written “do not resuscitate” DNR orders elicit negative reactions from stakeholders that may decrease appropriate end-of-life care. The semantic significance of the phrase has led to a proposed replacement of DNR with “allow natural death” . Prior to this investigation, no scientific papers address the impact of such a change. Our results support this proposition due to increased likelihood of endorsement with the term AND

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Death and philosophy.Jeff Malpas & Robert C. Solomon (eds.) - 1998 - New York: Routledge.
Current debate on the ethical issues of brain death.Masahiro Morioka - 2004 - Proceedings of International Congress on Ethical Issues in Brain Death and Organ Transplantation:57-59.
The phenomenon of death.Edith Wyschogrod - 1973 - New York,: Harper & Row.
Well-being and death.Ben Bradley - 2009 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Harm, Change, and Time.C. Belshaw - 2012 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 37 (5):425-444.
Reflections on Society, Medicine and Death.Anne Moates - 2006 - Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 12 (2):9.
Death.Shelly Kagan - 2012 - New Haven: Yale University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
75 (#221,804)

6 months
15 (#171,570)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?