Extinction of the human eyelid CR as a function of presence or absence of the UCS during extinction

Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 (5):642 (1966)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1037/h0023108

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Extinction of the human eyelid CR as a function of the discriminability of the change from acquisition to extinction.Kenneth W. Spence, M. J. Homzie & E. F. Rutledge - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 67 (6):545.
Effect of number of acquisition trials and the presence or absence of the UCS on extinction of the eyelid CR.Kenenth W. Spence, Edward F. Rutledge & John H. Talbott - 1963 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 66 (3):286.
Extinction and spontaneous recovery of conditioned eyelid responses as a function of amount of acquisition and extinction training.William F. Prokasy - 1958 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 56 (4):319.
Effects of CS and UCS change on extinction of the conditioned eyelid response.Louis E. Price, David W. Abbott & William E. Vandament - 1965 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 69 (4):437.
Extinction as a function of the spacing of extinction trials.Walter C. Stanley - 1952 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 43 (4):249.
Conditioning and extinction as a function of anxiety.Kenneth W. Spence & I. E. Farber - 1953 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 45 (2):116.
A comparison of rate and contingency of classical and instrumental reinforcement upon the acquisition and extinction of the human eyelid CR.Robert A. Fleming & David A. Grant - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 72 (4):488.
Acquisition and extinction of human eyelid conditioned response as a function of schedule of reinforcement and unconditioned stimulus intensity under two masked conditioning procedures.Bryce C. Schurr & Willard N. Runquist - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 101 (2):398.
Resistance to extinction and the pattern of reinforcement. I. Alternation of reinforcement and the conditioned eyelid response. [REVIEW]David A. Grant, Arthur J. Riopelle & Harold W. Hake - 1950 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 40 (1):53.
The acquisition and extinction of conditioned eyelid responses as a function of the percentage of fixed-ratio random reinforcement.David A. Grant & Lowell M. Schipper - 1952 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 43 (4):313.
Age differences in the acquisition and extinction of the conditioned eyelid response.Harry W. Braun & Richard Geiselhart - 1959 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 57 (6):386.
Influence of intertrial interval during extinction on spontaneous recovery of conditioned eyelid responses.M. Gordon Howat & David A. Grant - 1958 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 56 (1):11.
Resistance to extinction and the pattern of reinforcement: II. Effect of successive alternation of blocks of reinforced and unreinforced trials upon the conditioned eyelid response to light.Harold W. Hake & David A. Grant - 1951 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 41 (3):216.
Effect of intertrial interval during acquisition of extinction of the conditioned eyelid response following partial reinforcement.David A. Grant, Lowell M. Schipper & Bruce M. Ross - 1952 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 44 (3):203.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
12 (#1,090,149)

6 months
2 (#1,206,802)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references