Why don't mediaeval logicians ever tell us what they're doing? Or, what is this, a conspiracy?

Abstract

What I want to talk about here is a puzzle for historians of philosophy who, like me, have spent a fair amount of time studying the history of mediaeval logic and semantic theory. I don’t know how to solve it, but in various forms it has come up repeatedly in my own work and in the work of colleagues I have talked with about it. I would like to share it with you now.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,611

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

How to Start and Stop.Paul Vincent Spade - 1994 - Journal of Philosophical Research 19:193-221.
Conspiracy theories and conspiracy theorizing.Steve Clarke - 2002 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 32 (2):131-150.
Are Conspiracy Theorists Irrational?David Coady - 2007 - Episteme 4 (2):193-204.
Conspiracy Theories and Official Stories.David Coady - 2003 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 17 (2):197-209.
Popper revisited, or what is wrong with conspiracy theories?Charles Pigden - 1995 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 25 (1):3-34.
Against the logicians.Don S. Levi - 2010 - The Philosophers' Magazine 51 (51):80-86.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
100 (#175,444)

6 months
9 (#320,673)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paul Vincent Spade
Indiana University, Bloomington

References found in this work

Semantics and mental language.Claude Panaccio - 1999 - In P. V. Spade (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Ockham. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 53--75.

Add more references