The Making of the Neoliberal Subject: Response to Whyte

Political Theory 47 (2):185-193 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In her recent essay, Jessica Whyte has challenged the tendency to repurpose Friedrich Hayek’s thought for a progressive and participatory politics. Objecting to such thinkers as Michel Foucault and William Connolly who find inspiration in Hayek’s critique of the monolithic political sovereign and his defense of spontaneous order, Whyte contends that his neoliberalism is actually predicated on the cultivation of politically submissive subjectivity and the curtailment of democratic politics. While agreeing with her substantive conclusions, I suggest that her conceptual frame centered on the themes of invisibility and providentialism is limited in explaining Hayek’s ideas and, more generally, the operation of neoliberalism. Pace Whyte, I argue that Hayek’s neoliberalism does not simply stave off political challenges by obfuscation, but wages an active and highly visible campaign to recruit and interpellate individuals as market subjects.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,611

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On Immortality and Significance: A Response to Aaron Smuts.Senyo Whyte - 2012 - Philosophy and Literature 36 (2):490-495.
Anarchist, Neoliberal, & Democratic Decision-Making: Deepening the Joy in Learning and Teaching.Felecia M. Briscoe - 2012 - Educational Studies: A Jrnl of the American Educ. Studies Assoc 48 (1):76-102.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-05-10

Downloads
31 (#520,333)

6 months
9 (#320,673)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references