Historical Epistemology in France

Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 56 (1):150-168 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

As an independent philosophical discipline, historical epistemology had been forming in the French Academy from the early 20 century and to its middle developed to the point where it left behind other types of epistemologies, which succeeded to take revenge only in the late 1980s. However, historians and sociologists often consider French historical epistemology as a “marginal” discipline, compared to other areas of philosophical research. The focus of the study is the formation of the French version of historical epistemology as a philosophical discipline in the historical perspective, which includes not only recognized Maîtres of this direction, but also secondary figures associated with the development of this trend of philosophical thought. In the article we will try to demonstrate that historical epistemology, at least genetically, belongs to the general trend in the development of the philosophy of science, formed from the XIX century, and may well claim to be considered a “normal” version of epistemology and/or philosophy of science.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,963

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Birth of Philosophy of Science from the Spirit of Victorian Era.Ilya T. Kasavin - 2019 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 56 (1):23-33.
William Whewell’s philosophy of science and Immanuel Kant’s apriorism.Tatiana D. Sokolova - 2018 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 55 (2):180-185.
Vices and Virtues of Externalism.Ilya T. Kasavin - 2019 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 56 (1):60-64.
Historical Epistemology in France.Tatiana D. Sokolova - 2019 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 56 (1):150-168.
Comte and positivism.William Whewell - 2017 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 54 (4):209-224.
Science and the Zeitgeist.Alexander L. Nikiforov - 2019 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 56 (1):34-38.
History of Science a la Belle Lettre: a Case of Laura Snyder. [REVIEW]И.Т Касавин - 2016 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 48 (2):233-237.
A reflection on the alternative philosophy of science.Dachun Liu & Yongmou Liu - 2009 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 4 (4):576-588.
The Birth of Public Sphere from the Spirit of Intellectual Debates.Liana A. Tukhvatulina - 2019 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 56 (1):54-59.
Computer Science: features of Russian classification.Tatiana D. Sokolova - 2018 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 55 (1):31-35.
Contextualism in philosophy of science.Vladimir N. Porus - 2018 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 55 (2):75-93.
A priori and the Philosophy of Science. [REVIEW]Tatiana Sokolova - 2016 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 49 (3):225-231.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-02-15

Downloads
13 (#1,037,466)

6 months
2 (#1,200,611)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Tatiana Sokolova
Russian Academy of Sciences

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references