Notes on the Structure of Scientific Literature

Abstract

A method of using co-citation data to identify scientific specialties and trace their development through time is outlined. These are related to the structuralist "theory net" construct. The method is purely "theoretical in that no algorithms for implementing the method are suggested. Even at this theoretical level, the discussion is incomplete in several ways. Important formal properties of some of the concepts employed remain to be clarified. The specific way these constructs relate to theory nets remains to be specified in detail.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

An Empiricist Criterion of Meaning.Yann Benétreau-Dupin - 2011 - South African Journal of Philosophy 30 (2):95-108.
On the Methods of Thinking in Mo-bian.Hsien-Chung Lee - 2002 - Philosophy and Culture 29 (7):596-606.
On theoretical constructs and Ramsey constants.R. M. Martin - 1966 - Philosophy of Science 33 (1/2):1-13.
From Logical Formalism to Control Structure: The Evolution of Methodological Understanding.C. A. Hooker - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:211 - 221.
Methodological pluralism, normative naturalism and the realist aim of science.Howard Sankey - 2000 - In Howard Sankey & Robert Nola (eds.), After Popper, Kuhn and Feyerabend: Recent Issues in Theories of Scientific Method. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 211-229.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-09-07

Downloads
17 (#872,959)

6 months
1 (#1,478,781)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Joe Sneed
Stanford University (PhD)

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references