Terrorism, justification, and illusion

Ethics 114 (4):790-805 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Bernard Williams once said that doing moral philosophy could be hazardous because there, presumably unlike in other areas of philosophy, we may run the risk of misleading people on important matters.1 This risk seems to be particularly present when considering the topic of terrorism. I would like to discuss what seems to be a most striking feature of contemporary terrorism, a feature that, as far as I know, has not been noted. This has implications concerning the way that we should view terrorism (and counterterrorism) and shows the force of a number of neglected illusions surrounding the issue of terrorism, as well as its justification.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,963

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
177 (#110,473)

6 months
19 (#135,571)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Saul Smilansky
University of Haifa

References found in this work

Innocence, Self‐Defense and Killing in War.Jeff McMahan - 1994 - Journal of Political Philosophy 2 (3):193-221.
Innocence, self-defense and killing in war.Jeff McMahan - 1994 - Journal of Political Philosophy 2 (3):193–221.
The Killing of the Innocent.Jeffrie G. Murphy - 1973 - The Monist 57 (4):527-550.
The morality of terrorism.C. A. J. Coady - 1985 - Philosophy 60 (231):47 - 69.

View all 7 references / Add more references