Wittgenstein on language and nature

Filozofija I Društvo 23 (1):86-101 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The text begins with the analysis of two terms regarding life crucial to both Wittgenstein's early and late philosophy. These are life form and nature, specifically, human nature. Wittgenstein treats both concepts in a very specific manner, different from the traditional approach of philosophy. He also criticized philosophical attempts to attribute special characteristics to human intellectual abilities which would separate them from natural processes. A particular 'spiritual' status of epistemic and other rational powers disappears when there is an insight into their dependence on discursive practices and specific forms of life on which these powers are based. Concepts such as certainty, knowledge, or explanations do not rest on a rational foundation, that is, they do not refer to processes with particular un-natural properties. Nor can they be reduced to neuro-physiological processes, either. Instead, it is a specific grammar of their usage that makes them different from other concepts describing physical or biological processes. In that sense, Wittgenstein develops a non-reductionist version of naturalism which preserves the diversity of human relations in the world.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,075

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Moore and Wittgenstein on certainty.Avrum Stroll - 1994 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Can Wittgenstein Be Considered a Naturalist?Angel M. Faerna & Aurelia Di Berardino - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 53:55-62.
Why Certainty is Not a Mansion.Elly Vintiadis - 2006 - Journal of Philosophical Research 31:143-152.
Wittgenstein's scepticism' in on certainty.Norman Malcolm - 1988 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 31 (3):277 – 293.
Solidarity, objectivity, and the human form of life: Wittgenstein vs. Rorty.Greg Hill - 1997 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 11 (4):555-580.
Was Wittgenstein an epistemic relativist?Annalisa Coliva - 2009 - Philosophical Investigations 33 (1):1-23.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-17

Downloads
19 (#801,020)

6 months
2 (#1,202,487)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references