Nussbaum's Capabilities Approach and Religion

Journal of Religion 84 (3):379-409 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

An assessment of Martha Nussbaum's capabilities approach with respect to religion. I contend that her contribution to John Rawls's project of political-liberalism would be less accommodating of religion, specifically illiberal religions, than it desires to be. This feature weakens the capabilities approach as a foundation for inclusive and stable political institutions in pluralistic societies.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Political liberalism and global justice.Martha C. Nussbaum - 2015 - Journal of Global Ethics 11 (1):68-79.
Nussbaum, Kant, and the Capabilities Approach to Dignity.Paul Formosa & Catriona Mackenzie - 2014 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17 (5):875-892.
A New Problem with the Capabilities Approach.Thom Brooks - 2014 - The Harvard Review of Philosophy 20:100-106.
Rawls's Political Liberalism.Thom Brooks & Martha Craven Nussbaum (eds.) - 2015 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Martha Nussbaum und Aristoteles.Manuel Knoll - 2015 - Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 101 (1):32-51.
From Primary Goods to Capabilities.Eric Nelson - 2008 - Political Theory 36 (1):93-122.
Can Nussbaum’s Capabilities Approach be a Foundation of Politically Liberal Theory of Justice?Yuko Kamishima - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 50:293-298.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-06-22

Downloads
350 (#57,023)

6 months
91 (#51,287)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Skerker
United States Naval Academy

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references