Impaired Physicians: What Should Patients Know?

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2 (3):331 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

What should patients know about the degree to which their physicians may be impaired—unable, in the words of the American Medical Association, “to practice medicine with reasonable skill and safety to patients by reason of physical or mental illness, including alcoholism and drug dependence”? What patients do in fact find out about such matters as alcohol or other drug abuse by, say, the surgeon or the anesthesiologist in charge of their care is another matter altogether; most patients learn about such impairment the hard way. But what should they know beforehand, if at all possible?

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,991

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
27 (#608,353)

6 months
7 (#491,772)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

When the Doctor's on Drugs.Herbert J. Keating & Terrence F. Ackerman - 2012 - Hastings Center Report 21 (5):29-31.
Surgical Care of the HIV-Infected Patient: A Moral Imperative.William P. Schecter - 1992 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 1 (3):223.
When the Doctor's on Drugs.Herbert J. Keating & Terrence F. Ackerman - 1991 - Hastings Center Report 21 (5):29-31.

Add more references