The ethical and legal considerations of young people and their parents using a hospital patient portal: Hospital Ethics Committee members perspectives

Clinical Ethics:147775092210944 (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Background In April 2019, our hospital transitioned to an electronic patient record system and patient portal. MyGOSH enables young people aged 12 years or older and their parents to access results, documentation, appointments, and to communicate with their care team. Aims A focus group was conducted to explore the ethical and legal considerations of young people and their parents using a patient portal from the perspective of hospital Ethics Committee members. Participants and research context Members of the hospital Paediatric Bioethics Centre were recruited. Written informed consent was provided by all participants. Research design The focus group discussion was recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis. Ethical considerations Health Research Authority Research Ethics Committee Approval was granted by London Southeast REC. Results Four themes, and sub-themes, were identified: granting access – complexities of assessing competence/capacity, exclusion from MyGOSH due to non-disclosure of diagnosis, and truth-telling; inequalities resulting in inequities – complexities of inequity in access; responding to change – providing support and managing expectations; engagement, empowerment and understanding – data safety, empowering young people to take ownership of their health data, a one-size fits all system may not meet the needs of all families, and early engagement with young people/parents. Discussion Giving families portal access can increase engagement, empowering them to be more involved in care, yet poses challenges for all. Complexities exist in the assessment for portal access, and supporting and managing user expectations whilst providing an equitable service. Conclusions Ongoing support is required for all stakeholders following patient portal implementation to navigate the ethical and legal complexities, and to promote equity and portal utility for patient benefit.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,682

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Ethical Health Lawyer.Lance Lightfoot - 2005 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 33 (4):851-856.
The Ethical Health Lawyer.Lance Lightfoot - 2005 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 33 (4):851-856.
Invoking the Law in Ethics Consultation.Bethany Spielman - 1993 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2 (4):457.
Altruistic kidney donation: Is it ethical?J. A. Millar - 2001 - Monash Bioethics Review 20 (1):S54-S63.
What Actually Happened.[author unknown] - 2010 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 19 (3):416-416.
Retransplantation and the “Noncompliant” Patient.Mark G. Kuczewski - 1999 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 8 (3):375-375.
Hospital Ethics.Dennis F. Thompson - 1992 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 1 (3):203.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-04-22

Downloads
8 (#1,335,414)

6 months
3 (#1,026,267)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Faith Gibson-Knowles
University of Glasgow

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations