Sein und Zeit Revisited

Philosophy Research Archives 14:311-332 (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper I present the basic outlines of a nonstandard interpretation of Sein und Zeit. The merit of this interpretation is that it brings out and develops some of the radical possibilities contained in this rich text, possibilities which, I believe, have yet to be given their due. On the basis of this interpretation it is clear not only how Heidegger’s ontology departs from its Cartesian and Kantian predecessors, but also how his ontology puts the traditional mind/body problem, and the problem of the external world, onto radically new grounds. However, unlike standard interpretations of Sein und Zeit, I argue that these new grounds neither resolve, nor dissolve, these problems, and that Heidegger’s discussion of the so-called “scandal of philosophy” is misleading at best.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,654

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Sein und Zeit Revisited.Brent A. Singer - 1988 - Philosophy Research Archives 14:311-332.
Can Heidegger be understood?Richard Schmitt - 1967 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 10 (1-4):53 – 73.
„Sein“ ist nicht gleich „Sein“.Kaan H. Ökten - 2005 - Studia Phaenomenologica 5:257-273.
Heidegger and the Question of Community.James Patrick Gilbert-Walsh - 1999 - Dissertation, University of Toronto (Canada)
12. Das Versagen von Sein und Zeit: 1927–1930.Theodore Kisiel - 2003 - In Thomas Rentsch (ed.), Martin Heidegger. Sein und Zeit. Peeters Press. pp. 239-262.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-15

Downloads
20 (#783,073)

6 months
8 (#399,931)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references