Human Rights. Fact or Fancy? [Book Review]

Review of Metaphysics 40 (3):601-603 (1987)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Veatch's theme in this book is natural law as a basis for rights. He wishes to defend the classical notion that the good and the right, in ethics, politics and the law, can be found by some appeal to nature. In the first chapter of the book he directs arguments against the standard anti-natural law positions in philosophy, and against particular philosophers, like Hobbes and Kant. This is the least effective chapter in the book. The criticisms are not so much wrong as a bit weak and lacking in penetration. Some of the characterizations of philosophical positions are also in parts too simple.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,991

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Human Rights. Fact or Fancy?Henry B. Veatch - 1985 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 25 (2):123-125.
Human Rights. Fact or Fancy?George Nakhnikian - 1989 - Noûs 23 (1):108-112.
H.B. Veatch, "Human rights: Fact or fancy"?M. J. Mancini - 1989 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 25 (2):123.
Henry B. Veatch, Human Rights: Fact or Fancy?André Berten - 1988 - Revue Philosophique De Louvain 86 (69):112-113.
Questions Concerning the Law of Nature. [REVIEW]Arthur M. Melzer - 1991 - Review of Metaphysics 44 (4):849-851.
Kant against Hobbes: Reasoning and rhetoric.Gabriella Slomp - 2007 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 4 (2):207-222.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-03-18

Downloads
10 (#1,220,343)

6 months
3 (#1,045,430)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Peter Simpson
CUNY Graduate Center

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references