'Radical' pedagogy requires 'conservative' epistemology

Journal of Philosophy of Education 29 (1):33–46 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Many defences of multiculturalist educational initiatives conjoin a‘liberal’ or ‘radical’ moral/political view—that education should endeavour to treat students with respect, and that respecting non-dominant,‘marginalised’ students requires protecting them from the hegemonic domination of the dominant culture—with what appears to be an equally radical epistemological view, according to which respecting minority students and cultures requires respecting their culturally specific epistemologies, which in turn requires refraining from imposing upon them a dominating hegemonic epistemology concerning the nature of truth, rational justification, and so on. In this paper I argue (1) that this‘radical’ epistemological position is fatally flawed; and (2) that, if true, it would undermine, rather than undergird, the favoured moral l political view. I argue, that is, that proponents of‘radical’ pedagogy would do better to reject the associated‘radical’ epistemological view in favour of a more traditional,‘conservative’ one.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,471

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
39 (#412,276)

6 months
5 (#649,144)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

The implicit epistemology of White Fragility.Alan Sokal - 2023 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 57 (2):517-552.
Sphere Pluralism and Critical Individuality.T. Puolimatka - 2004 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 23 (1):21-39.

Add more citations