Abortion and Social Responsibility: Depolarizing the Debate

New York, US: Oup Usa (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Laurie Shrage attributes much of the long-standing controversy about abortion to Roe v. Wade and to the Supreme Court's controversial regulatory scheme in that 1973 decision. Shrage explores the origins of that scheme but argues for an alternate scheme - therapeutic abortions shorter than six months can protect women's interests and advance important public interests, but that reproductive rights campaigns should also focus on the social and economic conditions that prevent women having access to the abortion services they need. Including over 40 illustrations of pro-life and pro-choice advertisements to demonstrate the nature of the debate, this timely and provocative work will appeal to feminists in a wide range of fields including philosophy, political science, women's studies, communication, and public policy.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-01-31

Downloads
46 (#347,610)

6 months
6 (#530,265)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Laurie Jeanne Shrage
Florida International University

Citations of this work

Dignitary Harms and Abortion Law.Eric Scarffe - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (8):85-87.
Human rights and bioethics.Y. M. Barilan & M. Brusa - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (5):379-383.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references