Wittgensteinian developmental investigations

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):121-122 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I criticize Carpendale & Lewis's (C&L) attempt to produce a Wittgensteinian theory, as an alternative to work in the “theory of mind” tradition, not because I disagree with it as theory, but because Wittgenstein would be critical of any attempt to make such a use of his work. His concern is with descriptions, not theories.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,907

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
21 (#758,633)

6 months
5 (#703,779)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John David Shotter
University of New Hampshire, Durham

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references