Peter Lamarque’s aesthetic essentialism

Dissertation, University of Reading (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This thesis argues that the aesthetic character of some conceptual works of art can be determined by the possession of essential aesthetic properties. By discussing Peter Lamarque’s account of individual aesthetic essentialism one can suggest that conceptual works can be aesthetically investigated. Chapter I introduces the concept of the aesthetic and discusses Frank Sibley’s account of aesthetic concepts. Chapter II analyses in detail Sibley’s two fold relational character of aesthetic properties. Chapter III introduces Lamarque’s concept of aesthetic properties and it also insists on a distinction between artistic and aesthetic properties. Chapter IV introduces a general account of essentialism and then discusses Lamarque’s new object theory. Chapter V investigates Lamarque’s weaker version of individual aesthetic essentialism and analyses the distinction between essential and inessential aesthetic properties. Finally, Chapter VI considers the aesthetics of conceptual art and argues that some conceptual pieces have essential aesthetic properties. The philosophical discussions are supported by appeal to many different works of art, from traditional works to contemporary works. I conclude that all conceptual works have aesthetic properties but mostly there are inessential properties. My suggestion at the end of this thesis is more radical. A close analysis identified essential aesthetic properties in some conceptual works of art and this contribute to the aesthetic character and value of these works.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,075

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Aesthetic Essentialism.Peter Lamarque - 2001 - In Emily Brady & Jerrold Levinson (eds.), Aesthetic Concepts: Essays After Sibley. Oxford University Press. pp. 100--122.
Grounding Moralism: Moral Flaws and Aesthetic Properties.Aaron Smuts - 2011 - Journal of Aesthetic Education 45 (4):34-53.
Music and Metaphysics.Roosevelt Porter - 1997 - Dissertation, Cornell University
Aesthetic Properties.Rafael De Clercq - 2011 - In Theodore Gracyk & Andrew Kania (eds.), Routledge Companion to Philosophy and Music. Routledge. pp. 144-154.
Are there counterexamples to aesthetic theories of art?Nick Zangwill - 2002 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 60 (2):111–118.
Towards a theory of the aesthetic properties of persons.Carold Gould - 2012 - Contrastes: Revista Internacional de Filosofía 17:157-169.
A Critique of Moderate Formalism.Simon Fokt - 2013 - Estetika: The European Journal of Aesthetics 50 (1):41-52.
Aesthetic essays.Malcolm Budd - 2008 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Aesthetic Ideals.Rafael De Clercq - 2008 - In Kathleen Stock & Katherine Thomson-Jones (eds.), New Waves in Aesthetics. Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 188-202.
Aesthetic terms, metaphor, and the nature of aesthetic properties.Rafael De Clercq - 2005 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 63 (1):27–32.
A Vindication of Strong Aesthetic Supervenience.Robert Fudge - 2005 - Philosophical Papers 34 (2):149-171.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-02-25

Downloads
18 (#834,465)

6 months
7 (#433,721)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Aesthetic Concepts.Frank Sibley - 1959 - Philosophical Review 68 (4):421-450.
The Artworld.Arthur Danto - 1964 - Journal of Philosophy 61 (19):571-584.
The artworld.Arthur Danto - 1964 - Problemos 82:184-193.
Definitions of art.Stephen Davies - 1991 - Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.

View all 40 references / Add more references