Models with second order properties IV. A general method and eliminating diamonds

Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 25 (2):183-212 (1983)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We show how to build various models of first-order theories, which also have properties like: tree with only definable branches, atomic Boolean algebras or ordered fields with only definable automorphisms. For this we use a set-theoretic assertion, which may be interesting by itself on the existence of quite generic subsets of suitable partial orders of power λ + , which follows from ♦ λ and even weaker hypotheses . For a related assertion, which is equivalent to the morass see Shelah and Stanley [16]. The various specific constructions serve also as examples of how to use this set-theoretic lemma. We apply the method to construct rigid ordered fields, rigid atomic Boolean algebras, trees with only definable branches; all in successors of regular cardinals under appropriate set- theoretic assumptions. So we are able to answer the following algebraic question. Saltzman's Question . Is there a rigid real closed field, which is not a subfield of the reals?

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,991

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-16

Downloads
10 (#1,220,343)

6 months
1 (#1,514,069)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Remarks in abstract model theory.Saharon Shelah - 1985 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 29 (3):255-288.
Generalized independence.Fernando Hernández-Hernández & Carlos López-Callejas - 2024 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 175 (7):103440.
Higher Miller forcing may collapse cardinals.Heike Mildenberger & Saharon Shelah - 2021 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 86 (4):1721-1744.
Models of : when two elements are necessarily order automorphic.Saharon Shelah - 2015 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 61 (6):399-417.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations