Metropolitan Environmental Ethics: Toward Flourishing Human and Ecological Communities

Dissertation, State University of New York at Binghamton (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The purpose of this project is to outline an environmental ethic for metropolitan environments. I argue that philosophers have not adequately acknowledged the role that populated places play in their theoretical projects. The ethical, social, economic, legal, and political characteristics of metropolitan areas suggest that a need exists for a separate environmental ethical treatment for these environments. I examine the relationship between environmental values and the possibility of community in metropolitan regions. I locate a minimalist or thin version of community that, given current material realties, can exist in metropolitan settings. What holds these communities together are common interests, which form the basis of metropolitan communities of interest that I argue have the potential to produce shared metropolitan environmental values that can lead to change. I next argue that to be an effective tool for both human and ecological communities, a metropolitan environmental ethic must be guided by a bi-focal vision---one part focused on human communities, one part focused on ecological communities. A goal of flourishing human and ecological communities based on a program of weak environmental sustainability can guide environmental ethics and policy in metropolitan environments. If a metropolitan environmental ethic is going to be effective, it must account for the often-uneasy connection between environmental quality and economic development. I outline a model wherein social concerns "piggyback" on environmental concerns, and vice versa. By combining the two as interdependent parts of the same project, we can begin to move toward metropolitan environmental policy able to avoid the specter of gentrification. A metropolitan environmental ethic, taken alone, only leaves us, at best, with several autonomous metropolitan regions. I thus conclude by extending the insights of a metropolitan environmental ethic outward by highlighting the various political, social, economic, and ecological connections that exists first between metropolitan regions, and between metropolitan regions and non-metropolitan regions

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,953

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Technological momentum and the ethics of metropolitan growth.Robert Kirkman - 2004 - Ethics, Place and Environment 7 (3):125 – 139.
Feminism and Ecological Communities. [REVIEW]Greta Gaard - 1999 - Environmental Ethics 21 (3):333-336.
Environmental Art and Ecological Citizenship.Jason Simus - 2008 - Environmental Ethics 30 (1):21-36.
Towards an Adequate Environmental Virtue Ethic.Ronald Sandler - 2004 - Environmental Values 13 (4):477 - 495.
Environmental Virtues and Environmental Justice.Paul Haught - 2011 - Environmental Ethics 33 (4):357-375.
Epharmosis.Mick Smith - 2010 - Environmental Ethics 32 (4):385-404.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-06

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references