Informed Consent for Comparative Effectiveness Research Should Include Risks of Standard Care

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 45 (3):352-364 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper explains why informed consent for randomized comparative effectiveness research must include risks of standard care. Disclosures of such risks are both legally and ethically required and, for reasons discussed in the paper, should remain so.

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1177/1073110517737535

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,813

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Informed Consent for Comparative Effectiveness Research Should Not Consider the Risks of the Standard Therapies That Are Being Studied as Risks of the Research.John D. Lantos - 2017 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 45 (3):365-374.
Informed Consent and Standard of Care: What Must Be Disclosed.Ruth Macklin & Lois Shepherd - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (12):9-13.
Defining Research Risk in Standard of Care Trials: Lessons from SUPPORT.Joel K. Press & Caryn J. Rogers - 2017 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 42 (2):184-198.
Can informed consent to research be adapted to risk?Danielle Bromwich & Annette Rid - 2015 - Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (7):521-528.
Disclosure: The Hidden Weakness in Informed Consent.David Allan Brokken - 2004 - Dissertation, University of Minnesota
Quality Improvement Ethics: Lessons From the SUPPORT Study.Benjamin S. Wilfond - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (12):14-19.
Should protections for research with humans who cannot consent apply to research with nonhuman primates?David Wendler - 2014 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 35 (2):157-173.
When clinical care is like research: the need for review and consent.David Wendler & Rebecca Johnson - 2016 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 37 (3):193-209.
Audit of the Informed Consent Process as a Part of a Clinical Research Quality Assurance Program.Pramod M. Lad & Rebecca Dahl - 2014 - Science and Engineering Ethics 20 (2):469-479.
Informed Consent in Implantable BCI Research: Identifying Risks and Exploring Meaning.Eran Klein - 2016 - Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (5):1299-1317.
Stakeholders' Views of Alternatives to Prospective Informed Consent for Minimal‐Risk Pragmatic Comparative Effectiveness Trials.Danielle Whicher, Nancy Kass & Ruth Faden - 2015 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 43 (2):397-409.
Deferred Consent in Emergency Care Research.Andra le Roux-Kemp - 2014 - Journal of Philosophy, Science and Law 14:47-62.
Informed consent for research in Borderline Personality Disorder.Rachel E. Dew - 2007 - BMC Medical Ethics 8 (1):1-4.
The Epistemological Import of Informed Consent in Clinical Research.Oluwaseun Adeola Adenugba - 2013 - Bangladesh Journal of Bioethics 4 (2):34-40.
The Epistemological Importance of Informed Consent in Clinical Research.Oluwaseun Adenugba - 2013 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 23 (1):31-35.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-10-25

Downloads
11 (#1,160,245)

6 months
5 (#700,287)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Controversies in Clinical Research Ethics.Robert M. Sade - 2017 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 45 (3):291-294.
The CER Experiment.Lois Shepherd - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (1):49-51.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Transparency: Informed Consent in Primary Care.Howard Brody - 1989 - Hastings Center Report 19 (5):5-9.
What Should Be Disclosed to Research Participants?David Wendler - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (12):3-8.

View all 11 references / Add more references