Acquiring a new concept is not explicable-by-content

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (3):148 - 149 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

BBS Commentary on: Susan Carey: The Origin of Concepts. Carey’s book describes many cases where children develop new concepts with expressive power that could not be constructed out of their input. How does she side-step Fodor’s paradox of radical concept nativism? I suggest it is by rejecting the tacit assumption that psychology can only explain concept acquisition when it occurs by rational inference or other transitions that are explicable-by-content

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,571

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-07-27

Downloads
95 (#180,263)

6 months
9 (#300,363)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nicholas Shea
School of Advanced Study, University of London

References found in this work

The Language of Thought.Jerry A. Fodor - 1975 - Harvard University Press.
The origin of concepts.Susan Carey - 2009 - New York: Oxford University Press.

Add more references