A 'Strange' Case of a Paradigm Shift

In William Irwin (ed.), Dr. Strange and Philosophy: The Other Book of Forbidden Knowledge. Hoboken: Wiley. pp. 139-151 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the 2016 film Doctor Strange, the title character undergoes a radical transition from successful neurosurgeon to highly skilled sorcerer. Unsurprisingly, he finds this transition difficult, in no small part because he thinks that sorcery seems somehow “unscientific.” Nevertheless, he eventually comes to adopt sorcery as wholeheartedly as he had embraced medicine. Some of his reasons for making this transition are personal, such as his desire to fix his injured hands and, later, to help others. Strange also displays the same sorts of motivations that might drive any scientist: his intellectual curiosity drives him to understand how the Ancient One cured a paraplegic, and his desire to make a positive difference leads him to push the boundaries of sorcery. This chapter will examine what Strange’s transition can teach us about the nature of scientific inquiry. More specifically, we’ll think about when it might make sense for scientists like Dr. Strange to change their approach. This will also allow us to explore what it means to practice science more generally. Some of what we learn might be surprising. For example, while it might seem obvious to us (and maybe even to Strange) that sorcery can’t count as a science, there are reasons for doubting this quick conclusion, at least in the sort of world that Dr. Strange lives in. Finally, we’ll consider what all of this means for science in our world, where things differ quite significantly.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,574

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

It Is Strange.Per Jespersen - 1990 - Analytic Teaching and Philosophical Praxis 11 (1).
Kuhn, Popper, and the Superconducting Supercollider.Andrew T. Domondon - 2009 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 40 (3):301-314.
From magic to African experimental science: Toward a new paradigm.Christian C. Emedolu - 2015 - Filosofia Theoretica: Journal of African Philosophy, Culture and Religions 4 (2):68-88.
Is normal science good science?Adrianna Kępińska - 2015 - Semina Scientiarum 14:82-91.
Of the same in the different. What is wrong with Kuhn's use of "seeing" and "seeing as".Panos Theodorou - 2004 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 35 (1):175-200.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-11-03

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Brendan Shea
Rochester Community And Technical College

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references