Animal metacognition? It's all in the methods

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (3):353-354 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

When animals choose between completing a cognitive task and “escaping,” proper interpretation of their behavior depends crucially on methodological details, including how forced and freely chosen tests are mixed and whether appropriate transfer tests are administered. But no matter how rigorous the test, it is impossible to go beyond functional similarity between human and nonhuman behaviors to certainty about human-like consciousness.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,813

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Drawing the line on metacognition.Janet Metcalfe - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (3):350-351.
Do dolphins know their own minds?Derek Browne - 2004 - Biology and Philosophy 19 (4):633-53.
Animal cognition and animal minds.Colin Allen - 1997 - In Martin Carrier & Peter K. Machamer (eds.), Mindscapes: Philosophy, Science, and the Mind. Pittsburgh University Press.
Pigeon parallels to human metacognition.Edmund Fantino - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (3):343-344.
The sciences of animal welfare.David J. Mellor - 2009 - Ames, Iowa: Wiley-Blackwell. Edited by Emily Patterson-Kane & Kevin J. Stafford.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
55 (#296,866)

6 months
14 (#200,084)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sara Shettleworth
University of Toronto

Citations of this work

Can Rats Reason?Savanah Stephane - 2015 - Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice 2 (4):404-429.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references