Interpretation of the Subjects' Condition Requirement: A Legal Perspective

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (2):365-373 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Clinical research with children generates special ethical concern, raising the need for additional protections beyond those for research with competent adults. Most guidelines permit research with children when it offers a prospect of direct benefit, or poses minimal risk. Unlike many other guidelines, the U.S. federal regulations also allow institutional review boards to approve pediatric research that does not offer a prospect of direct benefit when the risks are no greater than a minor increase over minimal risk. To approve research in this category, IRBs must find that two additional conditions obtain:1). The intervention or procedure presents experiences to subjects that are reasonably commensurate with those inherent in their actual or expected medical, dental, psychological, social, or educational situations; and 2). The intervention or procedure is likely to yield generalizable knowledge about the subjects disorder or condition which is of vital importance for the understanding or amelioration of the subjects disorder or condition.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Retracing One’s Steps: Searching for the Ethics of Legal Interpretation. [REVIEW]Susanna Lindroos-Hovinheimo - 2009 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 22 (2):163-178.
Getting into Mischief: On What it Means to Appeal to the U.S. Constitution.Daniel Frost - 2015 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 28 (2):267-287.
Waiving legal rights in research.David B. Resnik & Efthimios Parasidis - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (7):475-478.
The Nine Lives of Legal Interpretation.Bruce Anderson - 2010 - Journal of Macrodynamic Analysis 5:30-36.
Enforcing the Law and Being a State.Gary Chartier - 2012 - Law and Philosophy 31 (1):99-123.
Frege's Sharpness Requirement and Natural Language.Richard Vulich - 2009 - Florida Philosophical Review 9 (1):78-90.
New Models for Language Understanding and the Cognitive Approach to Legal Metaphors.Lucia Morra - 2010 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 23 (4):387-405.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
11 (#1,141,291)

6 months
5 (#646,314)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The Dangers of Using a Relative Risk Standard for Minimal Risk.Seema Shah - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (6):22 - 23.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Law, Pragmatism, and Democracy.Richard A. Posner (ed.) - 2003 - Harvard University Press.
Defining and Describing Benefit Appropriately in Clinical Trials.Nancy M. P. King - 2000 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 28 (4):332-343.

Add more references