Newton-Hooke controversy in the opinion of scientists

Abstract

A presentation of Hooke’s 1674 monograph introducing the idea of universal gravity was included in the Philosophical Transactions (Royal Society 1775) and subsequently several letters containing observations, including one of Huygens. But obviously, after the publication of Principia in 1687, Hooke’s priority in proposing universal gravitation was forgotten. Hooke, considered as a “mechanical genius” rather than a scientist, was often at a social disadvantage to Newton, the noble theorist, or Huygens. Hooke’s inferior social status did not allow him to identify with “free and unconfin’d” gentlemen such as Boyle, for example. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.13746.45763

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Hooke and the Law of Universal Gravitation: A Reappraisal af a Reappraisal.Richard S. Westfall - 1967 - British Journal for the History of Science 3 (3):245-261.
The structure of a scientific controversy: Hooke versus Newton about colors.Maurizio Mamiani - 2000 - In Peter K. Machamer, Marcello Pera & Aristeidēs Baltas (eds.), Scientific Controversies: Philosophical and Historical Perspectives. Oxford University Press. pp. 143.
Twenty-nine years in the making: Newton's opticks.Alan E. Shapiro - 2008 - Perspectives on Science 16 (4):pp. 417-438.
Producing Knowledge: Robert Hooke.Ofer Gal - 1996 - Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-04-02

Downloads
208 (#96,975)

6 months
61 (#77,691)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nicolae Sfetcu
Romanian Academy

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations