Deep Ecology versus Ecofeminism: Healthy Differences or Incompatible Philosophies?

Hypatia 6 (1):90 - 107 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Deep ecology and ecofeminism are contemporary environmental philosophies that share the desire to supplant the predominant Western anthropocentric environmental frameworks. Recently thinkers from these movements have focused their critiques on each other, and substantial differences have emerged. This essay explores central aspects of this debate to ascertain whether either philosophy has been undermined in the process and whether there are any indications that they are compatible despite their differences.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,075

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
86 (#197,103)

6 months
16 (#157,774)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Can we wrong a robot?Nancy S. Jecker - 2023 - AI and Society 38 (1):259-268.
Identification with nature: What it is and why it matters.Christian Diehm - 2007 - Ethics and the Environment 12 (2):1-22.
Wilderness Philosophy.Hannah Gay - 1994 - Dialogue 33 (4):661-.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The shallow and the deep, long-range ecology movement. A summary.Arne Naess - 1973 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 16 (1-4):95 – 100.
The death of nature.Carolyn Merchant - forthcoming - Environmental Philosophy: From Animal Rights to Radical Ecology.
The Power and the Promise of Ecological Feminism.Karen J. Warren - 1990 - Environmental Ethics 12 (2):125-146.
The Phenomenon of Life: Toward a Philosophical Biology.Hans Jonas - 1966 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 22 (3):340-340.

View all 37 references / Add more references